Free · 2025 IRS rates

S-Corp vs Sole Prop savings simulator

See exactly how much an S-Corp election would save — or cost — at your income level. Includes California's $800 franchise tax and all overhead.

Your numbers
IRS requires a "reasonable" salary — typically 40–60% of net profit. Example: $80k profit → $35–48k salary.
California
+$800 min. franchise tax/yr
Gusto, Rippling, etc. Typically $500–$1,200/yr
CPA fees for Form 1120-S. Typically $800–$2,000/yr
SE tax savings
$0
before overhead
S-Corp annual overhead
$0
franchise + payroll + CPA
Net annual advantage
$0
S-Corp worth it above
annual profit
Sole Proprietor
Self-employment tax
15.3% on net earnings × 92.35%
$0
Federal income tax
After SE deduction + std. deduction
$0
S-Corp overhead

Total annual taxes
$0
Annual difference
$0
enter your numbers
Breakeven: calculating...
S-Corporation
FICA on salary
Employee + employer (15.3%)
$0
Federal income tax
On salary + distributions
$0
S-Corp overhead
$0
CA franchise tax$800
Payroll software$600
Accounting (1120-S)$1,000

Total annual cost
$0
Profit level comparison — Sole Prop vs S-Corp
$20k $40k $60k $80k $100k $120k $150k
Sole Prop better
S-Corp better
Your current profit
Assumes salary remains at the same percentage of profit as entered above.
Check my hustle →

When does an S-Corp actually make sense?

The math behind an S-Corp election is straightforward: you save SE tax on the portion of your profit taken as distributions instead of salary, but you take on real overhead costs to do it. The question is whether the tax savings exceed those costs.

As a sole proprietor, every dollar of net profit is subject to self-employment tax (15.3% up to the Social Security wage base). With an S-Corp, only your W-2 salary goes through FICA — distributions bypass it entirely. On $80,000 profit with a $45,000 salary, for example, you'd pay FICA on $45k instead of the full $80k, potentially saving $3,000–$5,000 in SE tax depending on the exact numbers.

The general rule: S-Corp typically makes financial sense at roughly $60,000–$80,000 in net profit in California (or $50,000+ in states with no franchise tax). Below that level, the overhead eats the savings. Above $100,000–$120,000, the savings are usually significant enough to make the added complexity worthwhile.

The breakeven point shifts based on your reasonable salary assumption. A lower salary means more distributions and more SE tax savings, but the IRS scrutinizes very low salaries — and if they reclassify distributions as wages, you'd owe back taxes and penalties.

The "reasonable salary" rule and how the IRS views it

The IRS requires that S-Corp shareholder-employees receive a "reasonable" salary before taking distributions. There is no specific formula — the IRS looks at what someone in your role and industry would earn as an employee. Comparable salary data, your specific duties, and how much time you devote to the business all factor in.

The 40–60% of net profit benchmark that many tax professionals use is a starting heuristic, not an IRS standard. A web designer billing $90,000 who could hire a comparable employee for $55,000 should probably pay themselves closer to $55,000 — not 40% of $90k.

The IRS has audited and won cases where S-Corp owners paid themselves $0 in salary while taking all profit as distributions. A good CPA will document your salary decision and keep it aligned with market rates. The SE tax savings are real, but only if your salary is defensible.

S-Corp costs you need to budget for

Before running the numbers, make sure you're accounting for the full overhead picture:

Important note: This calculator focuses on SE tax savings vs. overhead costs. S-Corps also have income tax implications including the QBI (qualified business income) deduction interaction, which can partially offset or amplify the savings depending on your situation. Consult a CPA before making this decision — the right answer varies meaningfully based on your state, industry, and specific income composition.